Upload your latest engagement survey results and ask Joy to read them. You get a written analysis with an inline chart of the favorable scores by driver, your eNPS, and the themes running through the open-text comments. A snapshot on demand, grounded in the results you loaded.
Analyze our latest [engagement survey] results and show me the favorable scores by [driver], our eNPS, and the main themes from the open-text comments.
An illustrative example. Your output will reflect your own sources, data, and prompts.
Reading the survey export you loaded, participation was strong and the headline numbers are healthy, but two drivers sit well below the rest and the open-text comments point to the same place. Here's the read.
Overall favorable is 68%, with 84% participation (about 790 of your ~940 employees responded) and an eNPS of +22. That's a solid base to work from, and the participation rate means the results are representative enough to act on.
The driver scores are where the story is. Favorable is highest on Manager Support (79) and Belonging (74), and lowest on Career Growth (58) and Workload (51), with Communication (68) and Recognition (62) in the middle.
Favorable score by driver (0–100)
Now the open-text comments, which is where the scores turn into something you can act on. Workload and capacity is the dominant detractor theme, showing up in roughly one in three negative comments, and it's concentrated in Support and Operations. A representative line, paraphrased and anonymized, reads "we're covering two roles' worth of tickets and it's not sustainable." Career growth and promotion clarity is the second detractor theme, with people asking what the path to the next level actually looks like: "I don't know what I'd need to do to get promoted here."
The praise runs the other way. Manager quality is the top theme in the positive comments, which lines up cleanly with Manager Support being your highest driver at 79. People feel supported by their direct managers even where they're stretched thin.
The takeaway is that Workload is both your lowest driver at 51 and the top detractor theme in the comments, so it's the clear first priority rather than a close call. And it points at the same teams, Support and Operations, that show up in your other people reads, so a workload fix there is likely to move more than one number. Career Growth at 58 is the second thing to look at, and it's more about clarity than a full redesign. I'd start with a capacity review for Support and Operations.
Want me to break the driver scores down by department to confirm where the workload pressure is worst, or pull the full set of career-growth comments so you can read them before the debrief?
The Engagement Survey Analysis recipe reads the survey export you upload to the Knowledge Center and returns a written analysis with one inline chart: favorable scores by driver, your headline numbers, and the themes running through the open-text comments. It's produced when you ask, not a board that refreshes on its own.
Add the results export to the Knowledge Center, including the driver scores and the open-text comment field. Load the prior wave too if you want the trend.
Ask for favorable scores by driver, your eNPS, and the main open-text themes. Joy reads the file at ask time and computes the breakdown.
Joy returns a short written read with one inline chart ranking the drivers, the headline numbers, and the themes from the comments. The figures in the prose match the chart.
Copy the read and the numbers into your survey debrief or leadership update. Joy drafts the analysis; you present it. Nothing is exported or scheduled for you.
Save this ask as a custom command on the assistant your team already uses, so anyone can run it in one step.
One inline chart ranks favorable scores by driver, with the weakest ones flagged so the problem areas are unmistakable.
Reads the open-text field and surfaces the dominant detractor and praise themes, so the comments back up the scores.
Pulls eNPS, participation, and overall favorable into one place so you can quote them straight.
Follow up to break a driver down by department or pull the comments behind a theme, and Joy re-reads to answer.
Ask for the driver scores broken down by team to see where a low score is concentrated.
Load the prior survey and ask which drivers moved up or down since last time.
Pull every comment behind a single theme, like workload, to read the raw voice before you act.
Compare favorable scores for people-managers against individual contributors to find the gap.
No. It's a written analysis produced on demand with one inline chart. When you ask, Joy reads the survey export you uploaded and returns the read for that wave. There's no persistent board refreshing on its own between surveys.
Joy reads the free-text field alongside the scores and groups the comments into themes, then reports the dominant ones with a representative, paraphrased line or two. In the example, workload is the top detractor theme at roughly one in three negative comments, and manager quality is the top praise theme.
Yes. Ask a follow-up and Joy re-reads the results to slice a driver like Workload by department or manager level, useful for confirming where a low score is concentrated before you decide what to do about it.
Always. The favorable scores in the prose are the same ones in the inline chart (Manager Support 79, Belonging 74, Communication 68, Recognition 62, Career Growth 58, Workload 51), so you can quote either in your debrief without reconciling them.
No. Joy drafts the analysis in chat; you copy it into your survey debrief or leadership update and share it yourself. Joy doesn't schedule recurring reports or send anything on your behalf.
Join the waitlist and be first to try this workflow when JoySuite launches.