Ask for a visual breakdown of your legal spend and get one built on the spot. Joy reads your outside-counsel invoices and matter data read-only, then shows the split by matter type, your top firms, and where spend is trending over budget — a dashboard-style view you can pull up whenever the question comes up.
Show me a breakdown of [this quarter's legal spend] by [matter type], with our top outside-counsel firms and where we're trending over budget.
An illustrative example. Your output will reflect your own sources, data, and prompts.
I read your e-billing and matter systems just now and pulled Q2 into a single view: the split by matter type, your top firms, and where you're trending over budget. Here is where the $1.28M went — 11% over the $1.15M plan for the quarter.
Q2 outside-counsel spend came to $1.28M, up 12% from $1.14M last quarter and $130K over the $1.15M budget for the period. The biggest matter type by far is litigation & disputes at $512K, 40 cents of every dollar, and it is also what pushed the quarter over plan.
Here is the full split by matter type. Corporate and employment work make up the next tier, and no matter type outside litigation tops a quarter of spend.
The pressure is in the trend, not just the total. Spend climbed every month and crossed the monthly budget line in May, then widened in June as discovery ramped on the largest dispute.
Monthly legal spend vs budget, Q2
Spend is concentrated in a short list of firms. The top four firms account for $922K, 72% of the quarter, and Harlow & Finch alone is $384K (30% of all spend), the single largest relationship and the firm on that ramping litigation matter. Here is how those firms sit inside their matter types.
| Firm | Matter type | Q2 spend | Share of total |
|---|---|---|---|
| Harlow & Finch | Litigation & disputes | $384K | 30% |
| Brightman Corporate | Corporate / M&A | $256K | 20% |
| Cendera IP | IP & trademarks | $154K | 12% |
| Ostrander Labor | Employment & labor | $128K | 10% |
Two things stand out. Litigation & disputes is both the largest matter type and the reason the quarter is 11% over plan, so that is where a budget review would pay off first. And with Harlow & Finch at 30% of spend on a single dispute that is still ramping, the one thing to act on is a fresh accrual and fee estimate on that matter before July runs further over. Ask for any matter type, firm, or month and I will read the invoices again and redraw this view around it.
Want me to break litigation & disputes down by firm, or show the same view against budget by month?
Legal Spend Analyzer turns your outside-counsel invoices and matter data into an on-demand visual read. Ask for a period and Joy reads your e-billing and matter systems read-only, then draws the split by matter type, ranks your top firms, and calls out where spend is trending over budget — a dashboard-style view built in the conversation, not a report you keep alive.
Link your legal spend sources once. Joy reads them read-only and only when you ask: outside-counsel invoices, matter records, practice-group coding, and the firms behind them.
Say the period and how you want it sliced — by matter type, firm, or practice group. Each time you ask, Joy reads the latest invoices, so the breakdown reflects the numbers as they stand today.
Get KPI tiles, a matter-type donut, a monthly trend against budget, and a top-firms table in one view, plus a short read on what is driving spend over plan.
Ask follow-ups like “break litigation down by firm” or “show this against budget by month,” then copy the view into a budget review or a note to the finance team.
Save this ask as a custom command on the assistant your team already uses, so anyone can run it in one step.
The whole period divided by matter type at a glance, with the total in the middle and every slice labeled.
The handful of outside-counsel firms that make up most of the bill, ranked with each one's share of total spend.
Spend by month against budget, so you can see the point where the quarter started running over rather than finding out after it closed.
Because Joy reads the invoices when you ask, the view always reflects the latest figures instead of a snapshot from last month.
Rank spend by outside-counsel firm to find the few relationships that make up most of the total.
Split the same spend by practice group or internal matter owner to see who is driving it.
Compare this period against the last to see which matter types and firms are the biggest movers.
Line each matter type up against its budget to see where you are running over or under.
It is an on-demand visual read, not a report you assemble or a board running in the background. Each time you ask, Joy reads your e-billing and matter data and draws the breakdown — KPI tiles, a matter-type donut, a monthly budget trend, and a top-firms table — right in the conversation.
They are as current as your e-billing data. Because Joy reads the invoices at the moment you ask rather than from a saved snapshot, the breakdown reflects what has posted in your matter systems today, including recently approved bills.
Yes. Ask for the same period sliced by firm, practice group, or matter owner and Joy re-reads the data and redraws the view around it. You can also compare two quarters or line matter types up against budget.
It shows spend by month against your legal budget and calls out where the quarter is trending over, so you can see the point it crossed the line rather than finding out after close. Joy surfaces the variance; the budget decision stays with you.
No. Joy reads your e-billing and matter data read-only. It never writes back, approves an invoice, or changes a record. It only surfaces the breakdown so you can act on it in your own tools.
Join the waitlist and be first to try this workflow when JoySuite launches.