Describe how a process works today and get a clear map back (every step in order, the role that owns it, and each handoff between teams), laid out as a structured table and step flow you can review, correct, and share.
Map our [customer onboarding] process from start to finish. Lay out each step in order with the role that owns it, the inputs and outputs, and every handoff between teams, as a table plus a numbered step flow I can follow.
Un exemple illustratif. Votre résultat dépendra de vos sources, de vos données et de vos demandes.
Here's your customer onboarding mapped end to end, from signed contract to first value. I've laid it out as a table of steps with owners and handoffs, then the same flow as numbered steps. Five handoffs stand out as the places things stall.
Seven steps, four teams, five handoffs. The table shows who owns each step and what passes to the next; the numbered flow underneath reads as a straight sequence.
| # | Step | Owner | Input to output | Handoff to |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Deal closed and handoff logged | Sales (AE) | Signed contract to account brief | Onboarding |
| 2 | Kickoff scheduled | Onboarding Manager | Account brief to kickoff date and agenda | None |
| 3 | Technical setup | Implementation | Requirements to configured environment | None |
| 4 | Data migration | Implementation | Customer data to loaded and validated | CSM |
| 5 | Admin training | CSM | Configured account to trained admins | None |
| 6 | Go-live check | CSM | Trained admins to live account | Support |
| 7 | 30-day value review | CSM | Usage data to first-value confirmation | None |
The flow, step by step
Where handoffs stall
I've marked steps 3 and 4 as the longest in elapsed time based on how you described them, worth confirming against your actual cycle times before this becomes the canonical map.
Want me to turn this into a RACI table for the four teams, or draft the account-brief checklist that would fix the first handoff?
Process Mapper takes how you describe a process and lays it out as a clear, structured map. Joy, the JoySuite assistant, orders the steps, names the role that owns each one, and marks every handoff between teams, the points where work usually stalls.
Walk Joy through how the work happens today: the steps, the teams involved, and where one hands off to the next. Rough and out of order is fine.
Ask for the columns that matter: owner, inputs and outputs, handoffs, timing. Joy fills in a sensible structure if you don't specify.
Get the process as a table of steps plus a numbered flow, with handoffs called out. Check it against how the work really moves.
Fix any step or owner with a quick follow-up, then copy the map into your wiki, deck notes, or a doc. It's editable text, not an exported image.
Save this ask as a custom command on the assistant your team already uses, so anyone can run it in one step.
Joy sequences the steps even when you describe them out of order, so the whole flow reads straight through.
Each step names the role responsible, so there's no ambiguity about who does what.
The map marks each point where work passes between teams, usually where it stalls.
You get text and tables you can correct in a follow-up, not a picture you'd have to redraw.
Group the steps by team so you can see each role's stretch of the process at a glance.
Add elapsed time per step to spot the slowest stretches and bottlenecks.
Add if/then branches for steps where the next action depends on the situation.
Map how the process runs now beside how you want it to run.
It delivers the map as structured text: a table of steps with owners and handoffs, plus a numbered flow you can read top to bottom. That keeps it editable and easy to paste anywhere; it isn't an exported image, so you correct it with a follow-up instead of redrawing it.
From how you describe the work. As you explain who does each step, Joy tracks where ownership passes from one team to the next and calls those points out, since handoffs are usually where a process stalls.
That's expected. Joy sequences the steps into a logical order even when you explain them out of order or remember one late, then shows you the ordered result to confirm.
Yes. Because it's editable text, updating a step, owner, or handoff is a quick follow-up. Paste the current version back into your wiki whenever a team changes how they work.
Yes. Point Joy at the SOPs or notes already in your Knowledge Center and it maps from those, matching the structure of your other documentation.
Rejoignez la liste d'attente et soyez parmi les premiers à essayer ce workflow lors du lancement de JoySuite.