Ask how learning is trending and get a written read with an inline chart: active learners, course starts, and completions over the last six months, with any drops called out. A snapshot on demand, grounded in your LMS data.
Using our [LMS] data, show me learning engagement over the last [6 months] — active learners, course starts, and completions — and flag any drops.
An illustrative example. Your output will reflect your own sources, data, and prompts.
Reading your Docebo activity for the last six months, the overall trend is up and July is the strongest month in the window. There’s one clear dip in May and a slower drift in completion, both flagged below.
Reading your Docebo activity for the last six months, engagement is trending up overall. Monthly active learners finished at a six-month high of 410 in July, up 6% from June’s 388. Course starts in the trailing month came in at 214, and completions across the window held at a 73% completion rate. One dip is worth flagging in May, and one slower drift in completion, both below.
Here is the month-by-month shape of active learners. The line climbs steadily from February through April, drops sharply in May, then recovers to its high in July.
Monthly active learners: Feb to Jul
Active learners moved 320 in February, 356 in March, 372 in April, then fell to 291 in May — a drop of about 22% from April. That dip lines up with your end-of-quarter crunch, when teams were heads-down closing the quarter and stepped away from learning. It bounced back to 388 in June and 410 in July, the strongest month in the window, so May reads as a one-month blip tied to the calendar rather than a fading of interest.
The one caution is completion. Even as more people started courses, the completion rate has drifted down from around 78% earlier in the window to 73% now. More learners are starting, fewer are finishing. With 214 starts in the trailing month, that gap is worth watching before it widens — rising starts with slipping completion can quietly mask a growing pile of unfinished courses.
Net: the trajectory is healthy and July is your best month yet. Two things to act on — protect learning time around quarter-close so May doesn’t repeat, and look into why completion is slipping even as starts rise, since that is the number most likely to undercut the upward trend.
Want me to break the May dip down by department to see who stepped away, or show which courses have the widest start-to-completion gap?
The Learning Engagement Trends recipe reads your LMS activity on demand and returns a written analysis with one inline chart: active learners, course starts, and completions over the window you choose, with any drops flagged and put in context. It’s produced when you ask, not a board that runs on its own.
Give Joy read-only access to your LMS or add an export of learner activity, course starts, and completions to the Knowledge Center.
Ask for engagement over a window — active learners, course starts, and completions. Joy reads the data at ask time and computes the movement.
Joy returns a short written read with one inline trend chart and KPI tiles, drops flagged. The figures in the prose match the chart.
Copy the read and numbers into your L&D update or stakeholder note. Joy drafts the analysis; you present it. Nothing is exported or scheduled for you.
Save this ask as a custom command on the assistant your team already uses, so anyone can run it in one step.
One inline line chart shows active learners month by month, so the direction is obvious.
Calls out where engagement dips and lines it up with likely causes like a quarter-close crunch.
Watches the gap between course starts and completions so a slipping completion rate doesn’t hide.
Follow up by department or course and Joy re-reads to help you find what’s driving a move.
Break engagement down by team to see who is leaning in and who has gone quiet.
Compare active learners and completion across courses to find the ones losing people.
Widen to twelve months to separate a seasonal dip from a real slowdown.
Center the read on the completion rate to catch a start-heavy, finish-light pattern early.
No. It’s a written analysis produced on demand with one inline chart and KPI tiles. When you ask, Joy reads your LMS data and returns the read for that moment. There’s no persistent board refreshing on its own.
Active learners, course starts, and completions over the window you choose. In the example it reads a trailing six months and shows active learners climbing to a July high of 410, 214 course starts in the trailing month, and a 73% completion rate.
Joy compares each month against the trend and calls out the ones that break it, with context. In the example it flags May at 291 active learners, about 22% below April, and lines it up with the end-of-quarter crunch.
Yes. Ask a follow-up and Joy re-reads the data to slice engagement by department or course, useful for tracing a dip back to a team that went quiet or a course people start but don’t finish.
No. Joy drafts the analysis in chat; you copy it into your program review or stakeholder note and share it yourself. Joy doesn’t schedule recurring reports or send anything on your behalf.
Join the waitlist and be first to try this workflow when JoySuite launches.