Ask for your security posture and get it in one view. When you ask, Joy reads your SIEM, vulnerability scanner, EDR, and ticketing through a read-only connector and returns KPI tiles — open vulnerabilities by severity, mean time to remediate, phishing-report rate, patch coverage, and open incidents — with a short read on anything trending the wrong way.
Read our security tooling and show me our security posture in one view — [open vulnerabilities by severity, mean time to remediate, phishing-report rate, patch coverage, and open incidents] — and give me a read on [anything trending the wrong way] ahead of [this quarter's security review].
An illustrative example. Your output will reflect your own sources, data, and prompts.
Here is your current security posture, read straight from your connected tooling. Open vulnerabilities are down to 342 and patch coverage is holding at 96%, but mean time to remediate on critical findings has slipped to 21 days, past its 15-day target, and that is the one to talk about in the review.
Here is where security posture stands going into the review. You have 342 open vulnerabilities across the estate, down from 361 last month, and they are heavily weighted toward the lower end: 12 critical, 58 high, 164 medium, and 108 low. Patch coverage sits at 96% against a 95% target, the phishing-report rate climbed to 68%, and there are 3 open incidents. The one number moving the wrong way is mean time to remediate on critical findings, now 21 days.
The open vulnerabilities break down by severity like this, and the shape is healthy — the twelve critical findings are the ones that set the pace of the review.
Mean time to remediate on critical vulnerabilities is the metric to watch. It has drifted from 16 days to 21 over the quarter and is now six days past the 15-day target. The cause is not intake — criticals are being triaged the day they land — it is the gap between a fix being ready and a change window to deploy it. Four of the twelve open criticals have an approved patch that is simply waiting on the next maintenance window, which is what is dragging the average out. Nothing else is off target: patch coverage held above its bar, phishing reporting is up seven points as the last campaign’s training landed, and the incident queue is the shortest it has been all year.
If you want to bring the critical remediation time back under target before quarter-end, the lever is the change cadence rather than the security team — an out-of-band window for those four ready patches would clear most of the overage on its own.
Want me to list the 12 critical findings behind the count, or pull the four with a ready patch waiting on a change window?
The Security Metrics Dashboard is an on-demand Visual Intelligence read. When you ask, Joy reads your SIEM, vulnerability scanner, EDR, and ticketing through a read-only connector and pulls the headline security metrics into one view: open vulnerabilities by severity, mean time to remediate, phishing-report rate, patch coverage, and open incidents. It returns KPI tiles, a severity breakdown, and a short written read of what is off target.
Give Joy read-only access to your SIEM, vulnerability scanner, EDR, and ticketing system. This is what Joy reads to count vulnerabilities, compute remediation times, and check coverage.
Ask for your security posture in one view and say which metrics matter, for example open vulnerabilities by severity, mean time to remediate, phishing-report rate, patch coverage, and open incidents. No query language and no console-hopping.
Joy returns KPI tiles, a severity breakdown of the open vulnerabilities, and a short read of what is off target, with the severity segments summing to the headline count so the numbers line up with each other.
Ask a follow-up to list the critical findings or pull the tickets behind the remediation time, then copy the figures into the board pack, the audit response, or wherever the review needs them.
Save this ask as a custom command on the assistant your team already uses, so anyone can run it in one step.
Open vulnerabilities by severity, mean time to remediate, phishing-report rate, patch coverage, and open incidents in one view, each read fresh from your security tooling when you ask.
The critical, high, medium, and low segments sum to the headline vulnerability count, so the breakdown is consistent with the number beside it rather than a separate pull.
A short written summary that names the metric trending the wrong way and why, not just the numbers on their own.
Follow up to list the critical findings, pull the tickets behind the remediation time, or compare against last quarter in the same thread.
Pull the same headline metrics plus quarter-over-quarter movement into a snapshot you can drop into the board pack or an audit response.
Ask for open vulnerabilities and remediation times broken out by team, application, or environment to see where the exposure sits.
Narrow the read to critical and high findings and their remediation times when the question is only what needs fixing now.
Center the read on the human layer — phishing-report rate, click rate, and training completion — ahead of an awareness review.
It is an on-demand read. You ask in chat, Joy pulls the latest figures from your security tooling at that moment, and returns the posture. It is not a standing monitor that watches between questions or raises alerts on its own.
No. There is no continuous monitoring, no email or Slack push, and no alerts. You decide when to look by asking — for instance ahead of a security review — and Joy answers with the numbers as they stand right then. Nothing arrives unless you request it.
Read-only access to your SIEM, vulnerability scanner, EDR, ticketing, and awareness platform. Joy reads these to count open vulnerabilities by severity, compute mean time to remediate, and check phishing-report rate, patch coverage, and open incidents, and never writes anything back.
It is the average time from a finding being opened to the fix being deployed, taken from your ticketing system and scoped to the severity you ask about. In the example, critical findings averaged 21 days against a 15-day target. Ask a follow-up to see it split by severity or by team.
Yes. Ask a follow-up in the same thread and Joy re-reads the data to list the critical findings behind the count, pull the tickets dragging out remediation time, or compare this quarter against last.
Join the waitlist and be first to try this workflow when JoySuite launches.