Sit an expert down with Joy, work through a structured set of questions about how they actually do the work, and turn their answers into clean, reusable documentation before the knowledge walks out the door.
Interview me about [how I handle our month-end close], one focused question at a time, then turn my answers into a structured written guide covering the steps, the judgment calls, and what commonly goes wrong.
An illustrative example. Your output will reflect your own sources, data, and prompts.
We worked through your month-end close over about a dozen questions: the sequence, the accounts you always double-check, and the two places it usually breaks. Here's the draft guide from your answers, ready for you to correct anything I misheard.
Overview. The close runs over the first four business days of the month. The goal is a reconciled trial balance ready for the controller's review by end of day four.
The sequence
Judgment calls
Where it usually goes wrong
Two things I'd flag as still thin: the exact standing-accrual list, and who covers the close when Priya is out. Worth a follow-up before this becomes the reference copy.
Want me to draft the follow-up questions to close those two gaps, or reformat this as a step-by-step checklist for whoever covers the close?
Institutional Knowledge Capture guides a real conversation with your expert and turns it into a usable document. Joy, the JoySuite assistant, asks focused questions one at a time, the way a good interviewer would, then drafts a structured guide from the answers, capturing not just the steps but the judgment behind them.
Tell Joy whose knowledge you're capturing and which process. It tailors its questions to that domain instead of asking generic ones.
Joy asks one focused question at a time (steps, exceptions, judgment calls, what breaks) and follows up where an answer opens a new thread.
Joy turns the conversation into a structured document (overview, sequence, judgment calls, and common failure points) in your Knowledge Center's format.
Go through the draft with the expert to correct anything, then copy it into the Knowledge Center so the team can find and use it.
Save this ask as a custom command on the assistant your team already uses, so anyone can run it in one step.
Joy asks one clear question at a time and follows the thread, so the expert talks instead of filling in a template.
It probes the exceptions and decisions, the parts that usually never make it onto paper.
Answers come back as an organized guide with steps, judgment calls, and failure points, ready to review.
Joy points out what's still thin, so you know exactly what to follow up on before it becomes the reference copy.
Run it in a departing employee's final weeks to record what only they know.
Interview several people on the same process and merge the answers into one guide.
Capture how a whole role works, not just one task, for the next person to step in.
Document the essentials before someone goes on extended leave so the team isn't stuck.
Experts rarely have time to write, and when they do they skip the judgment they take for granted. Joy interviews them conversationally, one question at a time, and does the writing, so you get a structured draft from a discussion instead of a blank document that never gets filled.
Both. Joy deliberately probes the exceptions, the decisions, and what commonly goes wrong (the parts that live in someone's head), not only the happy-path sequence.
You and the expert. Joy drafts from the conversation, then you go through it together to correct anything mis-stated before it goes into the Knowledge Center as the reference copy.
Then work from whatever exists: old notes, related SOPs, and a colleague who knows part of it. Joy drafts what it can and flags the gaps clearly so you know what's uncertain.
You copy the reviewed draft into your Knowledge Center or wiki. From there it's searchable, and you can build a Process Q&A ask on top of it so people get answers from it directly.
Join the waitlist and be first to try this workflow when JoySuite launches.